DOYLE E. WORKINGER, APPELLANT,

v.

DANIEL JACOB KLEIN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• In re Est. of Samuel Donner v. Anton, 364 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …no such duty, and without it, she could not be “charged with knowledge” of that agreement. Without a duty to inquire, negligent ignorance no longer has the same effect in law as actual knowledge. Cf. Applefield v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co., 176 So. 2d 366, 377 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965) and authorities cited therein. Without some knowledge of the contents of the settlement agreement, Lar-na could not have joined in to defraud Ruth. In addition to knowledge, a second element necessary to establish actionable…
• McDONALD v. McGOWAN, 402 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
  …otice should be determined by the trier of fact. Kilburn v. Davenport, 286 So. 2d 241 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); See McCausland v. Davis, 204 So. 2d 334 (Fla.2d DCA 1967), cert. denied, 212 So. 2d 869 (Fla.1968); Applefield v. Commercial Standard, Ins. Co., 176 So. 2d 366 (Fla.2d DCA), cert. denied, 183 So. 2d 209 (Fla.1965). III. INTERFERENCE WITH A CONTRACT RIGHT The tort of interference with a contract right, similar to interference with a business relationship, is recognized in this jurisdiction. Young v. Potti…
• McANESPIE v. McANESPIE, 200 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
  …F. 2d 792; Spencer v. Young, Fla.1953, 63 So. 2d 334; Moncrief v. Hall, Fla.1953, 63 So. 2d 640; Slatcoff v. Dezen, Fla.1954, 74 So. 2d 59; Ozgowicz v. Leighton, Fla.App.1963, 151 So. 2d 21; Applefield v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co., Fla.App.1965, 176 So. 2d 366; Gulf Coast Docks, Inc. v. Simon, Fla.App.1960, 122 So. 2d 414. When "the parties consent to the reference of a case to a master * * * to hear and .decide all the issues therein” the Supreme Court has declared it to be “a submission of the controver…

Authorities Cited

• Gulle v. Purley L. Boggs, 174 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1965)
• Baker v. Enid I. Deeks, 176 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
• Chapman v. State, 176 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)