BIRD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Dairyland Ins. Co. v. Makover, 654 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …the time of the accident is a purpose within the scope of the original permission. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Bentley, 126 Ga.App. 857, 191 S.E. 2d 887 (1972); Hodges v. Ocean Accident & Guar. Corp., 66 Ga.App. 431, 18 S.E. 2d 28, 32 (1941), cert. denied, 316 U.S. 693, 62 S.Ct. 1299, 86 L.Ed. 1763 (1942). [*1127] After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellants’ motion in the alternative for judgment n.o.v. or a new trial. The district court properly den…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Willitt v. Mrs. Georgeanna Purvis, 276 F.2d 129 (5th Cir. 1960)
  …application of the general rule that irrelevant evidence is not admissible. This is the law of Georgia. Turner v. Warren, 193 Ga. 455, 18 S.E. 2d 865; Hodges v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, 66 Ga.App. 431, 18 S.E. 2d 28, certiorari denied 316 U.S. 693, 62 S.Ct. 1299, 86 L.Ed. 1763. The rule prevails in the Federal Courts. Bird v. United States, 180 U.S. 356, 21 S.Ct. 403, 45 L.Ed. 570. The evidence was properly excluded and it would have been error, under the rules applicable in federal proced…
• United States v. Blanchard, 495 F.2d 1329 (1st Cir. 1974)
  …enable the defendants to understand the charge,2 and would have served as a basic protection against subsequent prosecution for the same offense. See, e. g., Powers v. United States, 75 U.S.App.D. C. 371, 128 F. 2d 300, 301 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 316 U.S. 693, 62 S.Ct. 1300, 86 L.Ed. 1764 (1942); Fed.R.Crim.P. 7(c); cf. Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 763-764, 82 S.Ct. 1038, 8 L.Ed.2d 240 (1962); United States v. Schartner, 426 F. 2d 470, 475-476 (3d Cir. 1970). Yet though amendment of the info…