ROBERT RALPH MANNING, A/K/A ROBERT RALPH MANNING, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT RALPH MANNING, A/K/A ROBERT RALPH MANNING, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
176 So. 2d 380
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
The appellant, by this appeal, seeks review of an adverse order on his petition filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. He urges, as the basis of his collateral attack on his conviction, that he was induced to plead guilty by promises made to him by his privately employed counsel.
We affirm the action of the trial judge in denying relief. The State is not responsible for promises or inducements made by one’s own privately obtained attorney, see and compare: Williams v. State, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 775.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Manning v. State, 203 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)…is entered because of the defense [*361] attorney’s promise of a lighter sentence does not render such plea involuntary. Baker v. State, Fla.App.1966, 188 So. 2d 346; Pitts v. State, Fla.App.1966, 181 So. 2d 739, 740; Manning v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So. 2d 380, 381. This is equally the law where the defense attorney is court-appointed. Pitts v. State, supra 181 So. 2d at 740. A criminal defendant cannot be given the option of rejecting his uncoerced plea of guilty if his sentence fails to conform with his…
-
Gonzalez v. State, 300 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)…ilty is entered because of the defense attorney’s promise of a lighter sentence does not render such plea involuntary. Baker v. State, Fla.App.1966, 188 So. 2d 346; Pitts v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 181 So. 2d 739, 740; Manning v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 176 So. 2d 380, 381. This is equally the law where the defense attorney is court-appointed. Pitts v. State, supra, 181 So. 2d at 740. A criminal defendant, cannot be given the option of rejecting his uncoerced plea of guilty if his sentence fails to conform with,…
-
Baker v. State, 188 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)…ef that a plea of guilty will result in leniency is not ground for collateral attack, under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, of an adjudication of guilt entered on such plea. Williams v. State, Fla.App.1965, 174 So. 2d 775; Manning v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So. 2d 380. Affirmed.…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 174 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)