MOSKOWITZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Fowler v. United States, 352 F.2d 100 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …192. Willfulness and fraudulent purpose are questions *for the jury. United States v. Vardine, supra, 305 F. 2d at 63; United States v. Schenck, 2 Cir., 1942, 126 F. 2d 702, 707, certiorari denied, sub. nom. [*111] Moskowitz v. United States, 1942, 316 U.S. 705, 62 S.Ct. 1309, 86 L.Ed. 1773. Certainly there was sufficient evidence presented here to submit the question of willfulness to the jury. The government, although only prosecuting appellants for the years 1957 through 1959, presented evidence of the…
• United States v. Fabric Garment Co., Inc., 262 F.2d 631 (2d Cir. 1958)
  …hich was a cona- [*638] pilation of the evidence basic to the prosecution’s calculations of the amount of serge furnished which was not returned. United States v. Schenck, 2 Cir., 126 F. 2d 702, certiorari denied sub nom. Moskowitz v. United States, 316 U.S. 705, 62 S.Ct. 1309, 86 L.Ed. 1773; United States v. Samuel Dunkel & Co., 2 Cir., 184 F. 2d 894, 898, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 930, 71 S.Ct. 491, 95 L.Ed. 671; United States v. O’Connor, 2 Cir., 237 F. 2d 466. And see United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S.…
• Lowery v. Clouse, 348 F.2d 252 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …either party and that the Minnesota court’s holding is not without its criticism. 43 Minn.L.Rev. 823 (1959). This court gave an adverse answer to the defendants’ contention in Concord Co. v. Willcuts, 125 F. 2d 584, 589 (8 Cir. 1942), cert. denied 316 U.S. 705, 62 S.Ct. 1309, 86 L.Ed. 1773, when it said. “We have found nothing in the rule * * * which appears to cast any doubt upon the propriety of the court’s submission of the written question in this case. The objections that it let the jury know what ef…