HOLLEY
v.
LAWRENCE, WARDEN
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Court has examined all the federal questions raised by appellant. In so far as the appeal challenges the validity of Georgia Code § 38-1604, which makes in-' competent the testimony of a wife at the trial of her husband, the judgment of the court below rests upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it, namely, that the failure to tender such testimony at the trial barred any later claim of the alleged constitutional right (Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Mims, 242 U. S. 532, 535). The Court finds that no other federal question presented by the appeal warrants review by this Court. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (106 total)
-
Daugherty v. State, 154 Fla. 308 (Fla. 1944)…L. Ed. 568; Ziang Sung Wan v. United States, 266 U. S. 1, 45 S. Ct. 1, 69 L. Ed. 131; White v. Texas, 310 U. S. 530, 60 S. Ct. 1032, 84 L. Ed. 1342; Ward v. Texas, 316 U. S. 547, 62 S. Ct. 1139, 86 L. Ed. 1663; McNabb v. United States, 318, U. S. 9, 63 S. Ct. 394, 87 L. Ed. 579; Anderson v. United States, 318 U. S. 350, 63 Sup. Ct. 598, 87 L. Ed. 829. [*323] Counsel for appellee contends that even though this Court should hold or conclude that the confession, identified in the record as State’s Exhibit No. 1…
-
Robert E. Hackett, M.D. v. Metro. Gen. Hosp., 422 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)…ractice of medicine. Moreover, the federal courts have consistently interpreted the Sherman Act1 to include within its prohibitions the practitioners of a learned profession. American Medical Association v. United States, 317 U.S. 519, 63 S.Ct. 326, 87 L.Ed. 434 (1943); Williams v. St. Joseph’s Hospital, 629 F. 2d 448 (7th Cir.1980); Ballard v. Blue Shield of Southern West Virginia, Inc., 543 F. 2d 1075 (4th Cir.1976). The allegations of the complaint, if proven, demonstrate a conspiracy2 which would fall w…
-
Ferguson v. Georgia, 365 U.S. 570 (U.S. 1961)…ed on the express ground that “the judgment of the court below rests upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it, namely, that the failure to tender such testimony at the trial barred any later claim of the alleged constitutional right . . . .” 317 U. S. 518. Wigmore concludes that “the principle of parties’ disqualification would have been the direct root of the disqualification by interest in general.” 2 Wigmore, p. 680. “[A]fter Coke’s time and probably under the influence of his utterances, the rul…
Previewing 3 of 106 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Mims, 242 U.S. 532 (U.S. 1917)