CHELTENHAM & ABINGTON SEWERAGE CO.
v.
PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION ET AL.; PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION V. CHELTENHAM & ABINGTON SEWERAGE CO.
CHELTENHAM & ABINGTON SEWERAGE CO.
PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION ET AL.; PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION V. CHELTENHAM & ABINGTON SEWERAGE CO.
317 U.S. 588
Supreme Court of the United States (1942)
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
In No. 160 the appeal is dismissed, and in No. 169 the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, for want of a final judgment. Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Fordney Co., 243 U. S. 251; Wick v. Superior Court, 278 U. S. 575.
Mr. George Henry Huft for appellant in No. 160 and respondent in No. 169. Mr. Thomas A. Foulke for Benjamin H. Davis et al., appellees in No. 160. Messrs. Claude T. Reno, Harry M. Showalter, Samuel Graff Miller, and Herbert S. Levy for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Fordney Logging Co., 243 U.S. 251 (U.S. 1917)
- Braunstein v. New York, 278 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1928)