EX PARTE ELMER E. DAVIS

Citator

Cited By

• Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200 (U.S. 1950)
  …69 U. S. 13, 17. 169 U. S. 284, 291. 175 U. S. 184, 187. Ex parte Spencer, 228 U. S. 652, 660-61. Bryant v. Zimmerman, 278 U. S. 63, 70. 294 U. S. 103. The point has been confirmed many times. Ex parte Botwinski, 314 U. S. 586; Ex parte Davis, 317 U. S. 592; Ex parte Williams, 317 U. S. 604; Ex parte Abernathy, 320 U. S. 219; and see cases cited in note 25, infra. 321 U. S. 114, 116-17. White v. Ragen, 324 U. S. 760, 767; House v. Mayo, 324 U. S. 42, 46, 48; Marino v. Ragen, 332 U. S. 561, 564; Wade…
• Ex parte Davis, 318 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1943)
  …Per Curiam. After we denied, without prejudice, petitioner’s previous application for leave to file in this Court a petition for habeas corpus, 317 U. S. 592, the Circuit Court of Vigo County, Indiana, on December 29, 1942, sustained a demurrer to his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Petitioner now alleges that he has filed an appeal from that court to the Supreme Court of Indiana. He also alleg…
• Ex parte Abernathy, 320 U.S. 219 (U.S. 1943)
  …e Hawk, 318 U. S. 746, or, if the relief sought is from the judgment of a state court, where the petitioner has not exhausted his remedies in the state courts, Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103, 115; Ex parte Botwinski, 314 U. S. 586; Ex parte Davis, 317 U. S. 592, 318 U. S. 412; Ex parte Williams, 317 U. S. 604. Refusal of the writ, without more, is not an adjudication on the merits and is to be taken as without prejudice to an application to any other court for the relief sought.…