FLOYD

v.

DU BOIS SOAP CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Campbell v. Louie L. Wainwright, 738 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …. Interestingly, the Muench court also reviewed several Supreme Court cases (apparently overlooked in Hughes) dealing summarily with the present issue. See Troche v. California, 280 U.S. 524, 50 S.Ct. 87, 74 L.Ed. 592 (1929); Coleman v. California, 317 U.S. 596, 63 S.Ct. 162, 87 L.Ed. 487 (1942); Fisher v. United States, 328 U.S. 463, 66 S.Ct. 1318, 90 L.Ed. 1382 (1946). As the Muench opinion explains, these short per curiam opinions are decisions on the merits of this question binding on the circuit court…
• Muench v. Israel, 715 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …Supreme Court consideration of the issues before us. Since the Court has said relatively little on these issues, we must give careful consideration to Fisher v. United States, 328 U.S. 463, 66 S.Ct. 1318, 90 L.Ed. 1382 (1946), Coleman v. California, 317 U.S. 596, 63 S.Ct. 162, 87 L.Ed. 487 (1942), and Troche v. California, 280 U.S. 524, 50 S.Ct. 87, 74 L.Ed. 592 (1929). At the same time, our understanding of these cases must be informed by the subsequent Supreme Court decisions in Washington v. Texas, 388 U…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Pohlot, 827 F.2d 889 (3d Cir. 1987)
  …court not to instruct jury to consider evidence of defendant’s borderline mental deficiency in deciding whether defendant who killed coworker who had complained about his work had done so with premeditation and deliberation): Coleman v. California, 317 U.S. 596, 63 S.Ct. 162, 87 L.Ed. 487 (1942) (per curiam) (summarily dismissing California pro se appeal challenging exclusion of evidence of mental abnormality on issue of mens rea); Campbell v. Wainwright, 738 F. 2d 1573 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S…

Authorities Cited

• Overnight Motor Transp. Co., Inc. v. Missel, 316 U.S. 572 (U.S. 1942)