KEYSTONE FREIGHT LINES, INC.

v.

LEE WAY MOTOR FREIGHT, INC. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Ashley v. United Transp. Union & ITS Affiliated Local NO. 1121, 625 F.2d 1357 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …plaintiffs cannot rely on non-labor legislation to remove the strictures of the NorrisLaGuardia Act. Id. at 339 n.15, 80 S.Ct. at 766. Accord, Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. Keystone Freight Lines, Inc., 126 F. 2d 931, 934 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 645, 63 S.Ct. 37, 87 L.Ed. 519 (1942) (Motor Carrier Act requirements do not enlarge federal injunctive jurisdiction in a case involving a labor dispute beyond limitations of Norris-LaGuardia). Here, however, the Norris-LaGuardia Act does not apply, a…
• United Steelworkers OF Am., AFL-CIO v. Bishop, 598 F.2d 408 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …is no less the cause of and impetus for the contract suit because the magistrate chose not to look beneath the contract rights asserted therein. See Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. Keystone Freight Lines, 126 F. 2d 931, 933 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 645, 63 S.Ct. 37, 87 L.Ed. 519 (1942) (plaintiff could not enjoin defendant carrier to comply with contract when, due to plaintiff’s dispute with its employees, employees of defendant refused to handle plaintiff’s freight). While the causal relationshi…
• Brotherhood OF Locomotive Firemen AND Enginemen v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 346 F.2d 673 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …ion here, since the effect of the injunction is to nullify the picket line and give FEC an advantage in the dispute it has with its [*676] employees. See Lee Way Motor Freight v. Keystone Freight Line, Inc., 10 Cir., 1942, 126 F. 2d 931, cert. den., 317 U.S. 645, 63 S.Ct. 37, 87 L.Ed. 519, applying the Norris-LaGuardia Act in a comparable factual situation, and cf. Marine Cooks & Stewards, AFL v. Panama S.S. Co., 1960, 362 U.S. 365, 80 S.Ct. 779, 4 L.Ed.2d 797. FEC’s primary contention is that even if the…