PICARD, ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL.

v.

UNITED AIRCRAFT CORP.

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Monroe Auto Equip. Co. v. Heckethorn Mfg. & Supply Co., 332 F.2d 406 (6th Cir. 1964)
  …* * is often a wise course for the small manufacturer.” Kay Jewelry Co. v. Gruen National Watch Case Co., 40 F. 2d 600, 604 (C.A. 6). See also, Picard v. United Aircraft Corp., 128 F. 2d 632, 641-642 (C. A. 2) (Frank, J., concurring), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 651, 63 S.Ct. 46, 87 L.Ed. 524. • It is to be noted that when these patents did go to trial they were declared invalid. Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Superior Industries, Inc., 220 F.Supp. 941 (S.D.Cal.). The District Court, in the instant ease, also h…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 258 F.2d 124 (2d Cir. 1958)
  …dered on an ineffective public demand, due at least in large measure to the advent of the depression, the Moray plywood must be considered as part of the prior art. Picard v. United Aircraft Corp., 2 Cir., 1942, 128 F. 2d 632, 634, certiorari denied 317 U.S. 651, 63 S.Ct. 46, 87 L.Ed. 524. Other relevant patents are Hansen No. 1,433,077; Maurer Nos. 2,202,109, 2,-202,110, and 2,244,426; Elmendorf Nos. 1,819,775 and 2,018,712; Morden No. 1,773,695 and Gram No. 2,090,529. Hansen No. 1,433,077 taught that the…
• Fredrick v. United States, 163 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1947)
  …so Zito v. United States, 7 Cir., 64 F. 2d 772, 773; Paschen v. United States, 7 Cir., 70 F. 2d 491, 493, 494; Pines v. United States, supra, 8 Cir., 123 F. 2d at pages 827, 828; Rose v. United States, 10 Cir., 128 F. 2d 622, 624, certiorari denied, 317 U.S. 651, 63 S.Ct. 47, 87 L.Ed. 524; United States v. Association of American Railroads, D.C.Neb., 4 F.R.D. 510, 528. 4. “The court erred in permitting the same offense to be charged in more than one count.” Without citing any authority, the appellants com…