ROSE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Monroe Auto Equip. Co. v. Heckethorn Mfg. & Supply Co., 332 F.2d 406 (6th Cir. 1964)
  …* * is often a wise course for the small manufacturer.” Kay Jewelry Co. v. Gruen National Watch Case Co., 40 F. 2d 600, 604 (C.A. 6). See also, Picard v. United Aircraft Corp., 128 F. 2d 632, 641-642 (C. A. 2) (Frank, J., concurring), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 651, 63 S.Ct. 46, 87 L.Ed. 524. • It is to be noted that when these patents did go to trial they were declared invalid. Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Superior Industries, Inc., 220 F.Supp. 941 (S.D.Cal.). The District Court, in the instant ease, also h…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Fredrick v. United States, 163 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1947)
  …so Zito v. United States, 7 Cir., 64 F. 2d 772, 773; Paschen v. United States, 7 Cir., 70 F. 2d 491, 493, 494; Pines v. United States, supra, 8 Cir., 123 F. 2d at pages 827, 828; Rose v. United States, 10 Cir., 128 F. 2d 622, 624, certiorari denied, 317 U.S. 651, 63 S.Ct. 47, 87 L.Ed. 524; United States v. Association of American Railroads, D.C.Neb., 4 F.R.D. 510, 528. 4. “The court erred in permitting the same offense to be charged in more than one count.” Without citing any authority, the appellants com…
• Buck Wilcoxon v. United States, 231 F.2d 384 (10th Cir. 1956)
  …disturbed on appeal unless it was clearly abused. Alford v. United States, 282 U.S. 687, 51 S.Ct. 218, 75 L.Ed. 624; Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680; Rose v. United States, 10 Cir., 128 F. 2d 622, certiorari denied 317 U.S. 651, 63 S.Ct. 47, 87 L.Ed. 524; Dickson v. United States, 10 Cir., 182 F. 2d 131. Without recapitulating the proceedings which give rise to the contention, it suffices to say that a painstaking examination of the record convinces us that no abuse of dis…