FABER, EXECUTRIX, ET AL.

v.

TRIUMPH EXPLOSIVES, INC. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Elastic Stop Nut Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 142 F.2d 371 (8th Cir. 1944)
  …. Copper Co., 316 U.S. 105, 106, 62 S.Ct. 960, 86 L.Ed. 1305; National Labor Relations Board v. Precision Casting Co., 6 Cir., 130 F. 2d 639, 643; National Labor Relations Board v. Martin Bros. Box Co., 7 Cir., 130 F. 2d 202, 205, certiorari denied, 317 U.S. 660, 63 S.Ct. 59, 87 L.Ed. 531. The evidence similarly supports the conclusion that the second of the statements made to Meistrell constituted a threat of reprisal. See Star & Crescent Boat Co., 18 N.L.R.B. No. 68. The fact that the employees to whom…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Clausen, 188 F.2d 439 (3d Cir. 1951)
  …Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co., Inc., 2 Cir., 130 F. 2d 503, 506; Firth Carpet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 129 F. 2d 633, 635; National Labor Relations Board v. Martin Bros. Box Co., 7 Cir., 130 F. 2d 202, 205-206, certiorari denied 317 U.S. 660, 63 S.Ct. 59, 87 L.Ed. 531; Rapid Roller Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 126 F. 2d 452, 460-461; Carter Carburetor Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 140 F. 2d 714, 718. Respondent objects to the background evidence of…
• Leishman v. Gen. Motors Corp., 191 F.2d 522 (9th Cir. 1951)
  …en if the disclosures of the prior art had fallen short of complete anticipation, yet invention may be negatived by such disclosures. Triumph Explosives v. Kilgore Mfg. Co., 4 Cir., 128 F. 2d 444, 447, certiorari denied, Faber v. Triumph Explosives, 317 U.S. 660, 63 S.Ct. 59, 87 L.Ed. 530. We think that the record sufficiently sustains the view of the trial court that even if appellant’s combination had disclosed something new, it would still fall short of invention. We must presume that Leishman knew that…