LOFTIN ET AL., RECEIVERS,

v.

CROWLEY'S, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Hunter v. Flowers, 43 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1949)
• Lanier v. Tyson, 147 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)
  …l protection of the law guaranteed by the United States Constitution; Great Northern Railway Co. v. Whitfield, 1937, 65 S.D. 173, 272 N.W. 787, 111 A.L.R. 1475; Loftin v. Crowley’s Inc., 1942, 150 Fla. 836, 8 So. 2d 909, 142 A.L.R. 626, cert. denied 317 U.S. 661, 63 S.Ct. 60, 87 L.Ed. 531; nor does it per se contravene the uniform and equal rate and just valuation provisions of the Florida Constitution. Levy v. Smith, 1851, 4 Fla. 154; Hayes v. Walker, 1907, 54 Fla. 163, 44 So. 747; State v. City of Miami,…
• Holmes v. Simpson, 28 Fla. Supp. 159 (Duval Cty. Cir. Ct. 1967)
  …ature from making proper and reasonable classifications so long as such classifications are not arbitrary, unreasonable or unjustly discriminatory. Loftin v. Crowley’s, Inc., 150 Fla. 836, 8 So. 2d 909, 142 A.L.R. 626, certiorari denied 63 S.Ct. 60, 317 U.S. 661, 87 L. Ed. 531. One of the latest Florida cases is that of King Cole Inc. v. Bryant, S.C., 178 So. 2d 2. Mr. Justice Thornal stated — We lay aside any extended discussion of the state’s power to select the subjects of excise taxation. It is suffic…