INDUSTRIAL BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

v.

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Minella v. Bankruptcy, 245 F.2d 687 (5th Cir. 1957)
  …ation has been approved by the district court, it should not be disturbed on appeal except for the most cogent reasons. Hedges v. Bushnell, 10 Cir., 1939, 106 F. 2d 979; In re Bendix, 7 Cir., 1942, 127 F. 2d 759, certiorari denied Hillmer v. Bendix, 317 U.S. 668, 63 S.Ct. 73, 87 L.Ed. 537; Williamson v. Williams, 4 Cir., 1943, 137 F. 2d 298; Gold v. John R. Blair Co., 2 Cir., 1944, 142 F. 2d 209; Burchett v. Myers, 9 Cir., 1953, 202 F. 2d 920; Kan [*691] sas Federal Credit Union v. Niemeier, 10 Cir., 1955,…
• Pattie Lucinda Hilliard v. Hollins-Appellee, 290 F.2d 263 (6th Cir. 1961)
  …supported by Findings of Fact that are not clearly erroneous, is within the discretion of those officers, and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of such discretion. In re Bendix, 7 Cir., 1942, 127 F. 2d 759, certiorari denied 317 U.S. 668, 63 S.Ct. 73, 87 L.Ed. 537;. Baily et al. v. Ballance, 4 Cir., 1941, 123 F. 2d 352; Texas National Bank of Beaumont v. Edson, 5 Cir., 1939, 100 F. 2d 789, 791; In re Marx, 7 Cir., 1942, 125 F. 2d 335, 337. We find no such abuse here. Supported by a…