LEVINE

v.

LEVINE

Citator

Cited By

• Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co., 175 F.2d 795 (3d Cir. 1949)
  …aw. The Courts of Appealswliich have passed upon this question have applied federal law. Dwinell-Wright Co. v. National Fruit Product Co., 1 Cir., 1944, 140 F. 2d 618; Time, Inc., v. Viobin Corp., 7 Cir., 1942, 128 F. 2d 860, certiorari denied 1942, 317 U.S. 673, 63 S.Ct. 78, 87 L.Ed. 540; Philco Corp. v. Philips Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 1943, 133 F. 2d 663, 148 A.L.R. 125. The case for applying federal law in this field is fully and persuasively stated in Zlinkoff, Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins: In Relation to th…
• Safeway Stores v. Safeway Props., Inc., 307 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …v. Tiffany Productions, 147 Misc. 679, 264 N.Y.S. 459, aff’d, 237 App.Div. 801, 260 N.Y.S. 821 (1932) , aff’d, 262 N.Y. 482, 188 N.E. 30 (1933) ; Time, Inc. v. Viobin Corp., 40 F.Supp. 249 (E.D.Ill.1941), aff’d 128 F. 2d 860 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 673, 63 S.Ct. 78, 87 L.Ed. 540 (1942). As we have indicated above, the touchstone is whether confusion is likely to occur. The district court found confusion to be present in the minds of some people. From this fact it was reasonable to conclude that…
• Dwinell-Wright Co. v. Nat'l Fruit Prod. Co., Inc., 140 F.2d 618 (1st Cir. 1944)
  …d v. Tompkins; In Relation to the Law of Trade-Marks and Unfair Competition, 42 Columbia Law Review 955, and by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Time, Inc., v. Viobin Corporation, 128 F. 2d 860, certiorari denied 317 U.S. 673, 63 S.Ct. 78, and Philco Corporation v. Phillips Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 133 F. 2d 663, and in view of these authorities, which are all in agreement, we think it would serve no useful purpose for us to consider it again in this opinion. It will suffice fo…