BRADFORD ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …rty loss. See, e. g., United States v. Dorfman, S.D.N.Y., 335 F.Supp. 675, 679, aff’d on other grounds, 2 Cir., 470 F. 2d 246; United States v. Faser, E.D.La., 303 F.Supp. 380, 384; Bradford v. United States, 5 Cir., 129 F. 2d 274, 276, cert. denied 317 U.S. 683, 63 S.Ct. 205, 87 L.Ed. 547. In a related development, the Supreme Court has made clear that a defendant may be convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371, even though the government has not suffered a financial loss. Haa…
• Midlantic Nat'l Bank v. N.J. Dep't of Env't Prot., 474 U.S. 494 (U.S. 1986)
  …perty by contract, but a duty and a burden imposed upon an owner of vessels by an Act of Congress in the public interest.” Id., at 290. In In re Chicago Rapid Transit Co., 129 F. 2d 1 (CA7), cert. denied sub nom. Chicago Junction R. Co. v. Sprague, 317 U. S. 683 (1942), the Court of Appeals held that the trustee of a debtor transit company could not cease its operation [*501] of a branch railway line when local law required continued operation. While the court did not forbid the trustee to abandon property…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• De Luna v. United States, 308 F.2d 140 (5th Cir. 1962)
  …922, 281 F. 137, cert. den., 260 U.S. 721, 43 S.Ct. 12, 67 L.Ed. 481. But no presumption or inference of guilt was permissible against de Luna from the fact that he did not testify. Bradford v. United States, 5 Cir., 1942, 130 F. 2d 630, cert. den., 317 U.S. 683, 63 S.Ct. 205, 87 L.Ed. 547. All comment in the presence of the jury upon his omission to testify was forbidden. Wilson v. United States, 1893, 149 U.S. 60, 13 S.Ct. 765, 37 L.Ed. 650; [*156] Stewart v. United States, 1961, 366 U.S. 1, 81 S.Ct. 941,…