THOMSON, TRUSTEE,

v.

SEVIER, ADMINISTRATRIX

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1945)
  …, accords with the decision in this case. Contrary decisions were rendered in City of Oakland v. United States, 124 F. 2d 959 (C. C. A. 9), cert. denied, 316 U. S. 679; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F. 2d 678 (C. C. A. 2), cert. denied, 317 U. S. 698; Puerto Rico R. Co. v. United States, 131 F. 2d 491 (C. C. A. 2). Under the comparable provision of the 1929 act applicable in the District of Columbia, where special appeal may be allowed upon interlocutory orders, D. C. Code (1940) § 17-101, comp…
• Audi Vision Inc. v. RCA MFG. Co., Inc., 136 F.2d 621 (2d Cir. 1943)
  …result which the law still “wisely prevents by postponing the right of appeal until there is a final decree disposing of the whole case.” United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F. 2d 678, 680, certiorari denied Lambert v. United States, 317 U.S. 698, 63 S.Ct. 441, 87 L.Ed. -; Leonard v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 7 Cir., 130 F. 2d 535. In the present case it can hardly be questioned that the tests of finality have not been met. In fact the claims are so connected that they turn upon the proper mea…
• Colin Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …08, 88 S.Ct. 269, 280, 19 L.Ed.2d 305 (1967) (Black, J. concurring); it is “not a clear, one-purpose word; it is slithery, tricky.” United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F. 2d 678, 680 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Lambert v. United States, 317 U.S. 698, 63 S.Ct. 441, 87 L.Ed. 558 (1942). For this reason, the Supreme Court has developed several doctrinal exceptions to the general finality rule that rest on a “practical rather than a technical construction.” Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S.…