EX PARTE E. C. LILLY; EX PARTE JOHN RUSSELL MILLER; AND EX PARTE JAMES RAYMOND BUCHANAN

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. United Mine Workers of Am., 330 U.S. 258 (U.S. 1947)
  …status of the Government as employer is not inconsistent with the desire of the House to exclude from the Act those disputes in which the United States is seeking relief against its own employees. United States v. American Federation of Musicians, 318 U. S. 741 (1943) ; see United States v. Hutcheson, 312 U. S. 219, 227 (1941). In accord is United States v. Weirton Steel Co., 7 F. Supp. 255 (1934); cf. Anderson v. Bigelow, 130 F. 2d 460 (1942). It was upon § 3 of this Act that the President based in part…
• United Mine Workers of Am. v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 (U.S. 1965)
  …olating the Sherman Act. United States v. Hutcheson, 312 U. S. 219; United States v. International Hod Carriers Council, 313 U. S. 539, affirming per curiam, 37 F. Supp. 191 (D. C. N. D. Ill. 1941); United States v. American Federation of Musicians, 318 U. S. 741, affirming per curiam, 47 F. Supp. 304 (D. C. N. D. Ill. 1942). But neither § 20 nor § 4 expressly deals with arrangements or agreements between unions and employers. Neither section tells us whether any or all such arrangements or agreements are b…
• Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union NO. 3, 325 U.S. 797 (U.S. 1945)
  …son case. This advance in the law was emphasized in United States v. Building Trades Council, 313 U. S. 539, and United States v. Brotherhood of Carpenters, 313 U. S. 539, but the court went even farther, in United States v. Federation of Musicians, 318 U. S. 741, and, as I think, rendered a decision contrary to that now announced. There a motion to dismiss a bill of complaint was granted and this court sustained that action. The complaint charged a conspiracy by the American Federation of Musicians, a natio…

  ← 1 / 2 →