MURDOCK
v.
PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE); PERISICH V. PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE); MOWDER V. PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE); SEDERS V. PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE); LAMBORN V. PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE); MALTEZOS V. PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE); ANASTASIA TZANES V. PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE); AND ELLAINE TZANES V. PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE)

U.S. | 1943-02-15
Nos. 480; No. 481; No. 482; No. 483; No. 484; No. 485; No. 486; No. 487
318 U.S. 748 Supreme Court of the United States (1943) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Denton v. City of Carrollton, 235 F.2d 481 (5th Cir. 1956)
    …recoverable under Georgia law, which fact, under Toomer v. Witsell, infra, removes the rigor' of the license-fees as a consideration which should be , weighed in determining the wisdom of .equity intervention. . 149 Pa.Super. 175, 27 A. 2d 666. . 318 U.S. 748, 63 S.Ct. 660, 87 L.Ed. 1125. . Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1943, 319 U.S. 105, 63 S.Ct. 891, 87 L.Ed. 1292. . Douglas v. City of Jeannette, D.C.W.D. Pa.1941, 39 F.Supp. 32, and cf. Reid v. Borough of Brookville, Pa., D.O.W.D. Pa.1941…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw