GREEN, DOING BUSINESS AS GREEN VACUUM CLEANER CO.,

v.

ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANER CO., INC.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Dotterweich, 320 U.S. 277 (U.S. 1943)
  …nless, perchance, Buffalo Pharmacal was a counterfeit corporation serving as a screen for Dotterweich. On that issue, after rehearing, it remanded the cause for a new trial. We then brought the case here, on the Government’s petition for certiorari, 318 U. S. 753, because this construction raised questions of importance in the enforcement of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The court below drew its conclusion not from the provisions defining the offenses on which this prosecution was based (§§ 301…
• Red Devil Tools v. Hyde MFG. Co., 193 F.2d 491 (1st Cir. 1951)
  …shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous”. Rule 52, Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A. B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Massachusetts Hair & Felt Co., 1 Cir., 122 F. 2d 900; Green v. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co., 6 Cir., 132 F. 2d 312, certiorari granted 318 U.S. 753, 63 S.Ct. 858, 87 L.Ed. 1128, dismissed 319 U.S. 777, 63 S.Ct. 1163, 87 L.Ed. 1723. We cannot say on the record here that the findings of fact are clearly erroneous. We do not believe that the Echikson- patent meets the test laid down by the Suprem…