MOORE-MCCORMACK LINES, INC.

v.

FOSTER

Citator

Cited By

• Price v. Johnston, 334 U.S. 266 (U.S. 1948)
  …not mean to say that the appellate court may not, under some circumstances, require his personal presence; but only that his presence is not essential to its jurisdiction to proceed with the case.” In Goldsmith v. Sanford, 132 F. 2d 126, cert. den. 318 U. S. 762, rehearing denied 318 U. S. 799, the Court said: “. . . We know of no precedent for taking a prisoner from the penitentiary that he might be present to argue in person his appeal from an adverse judgment on habeas corpus. ... If there be power to or…
• Aluminum Co. OF Am. v. Sperry Prods., Inc., 285 F.2d 911 (6th Cir. 1960)
  …Holland Co. v. American Steel Foundries, 7 Cir., 190 F. 2d 37, certiorari denied, 342 U.S. 859, 72 S.Ct. 86, 96 L.Ed. 647; Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson, 6 Cir., 122 F. 2d 796; Kelley-Koett v. McEuen, 6 Cir., 130 F. 2d 488, certiorari denied, 318 U.S. 762, 63 S.Ct. 662, 87 L.Ed. 1134. With these principles in mind, we proceed to analyze the Immerscope with reference to infringement of the Firestone patents. The Immerscope consists of the following essential elements or component parts: A device con…
• Constr., Ltd. v. Brooks-Skinner Bldg. Co., 488 F.2d 427 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …-Skinner ($45,571) is arrived at by subtracting the verdict in favor of Brooks-Skinner ($68,925) from the total damages sought by Construction ($114,446). . Cf. Foster v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 131 F. 2d 907, 908 (2d Cir. 1952), cert. denied, 318 U.S. 762, 63 S.Ct. 560, 87 L.Ed. 1134 (1943) (“Whether the jury . . . weighed the testimony in light of the judge’s instructions, of course, we do not know, and, indeed, are forbidden to inquire.”). . We have considered the several other contentions raised…