EWING
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1943-03-15
No. 661
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
318 U.S. 776 Supreme Court of the United States (1943) Caution
Cited by 96 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (46 total)

  • United States v. Barrett, 539 F.2d 244 (1st Cir. 1976)
    …cCormick, supra, § 34, at 68 n. 15. Furthermore, the fact that Adams’ belief that Bucky was not involved might be called an “opinion” is immaterial. Id. § 35; see Ewing v. United States, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 14, 135 F. 2d 633, 642 (1942), cert. denied, 318 U.S. 776, 63 S.Ct. 829, 87 L.Ed. 1145 (1943). The important point is the clear incompatibility between Adams’ direct testimony and the alleged statement. The Government also urges that Delaney’s memory of the timing of the statement was uncertain, as well a…
  • Villaroman v. United States, 184 F.2d 261 (D.C. Cir. 1950)
  • United States v. Kinnard, 465 F.2d 566 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
    …418, 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966). . Alford v. United States, 282 U.S. 687, 692, 51 S.Ct. 218, 75 L.Ed. 624 (1931); United States v. Griffin, supra note 10, 382 F. 2d at 829; Ewing v. United States, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 14, 135 F. 2d 633 (1942), cert. denied, 318 U.S. 776, 63 S.Ct. 829, 87 L.Ed. 1145 (1943). . At this point, the defendant could object to the court’s instruction if it in any way prejudiced his defense. . This court has resolved this same dilemma in another context by urging trial judges to inquire s…

Previewing 3 of 46 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw