WASHINGTON TERMINAL CO.

v.

BOSWELL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Sture v. Sigfred, 230 F.2d 13 (5th Cir. 1956)
  …. Ry. Co. v. Burley, supra, 325 U.S. at pages 719, 720, 65 S.Ct. at pages 1287, 1288, was another, and its affirmance by an equally divided court of Washington Terminal Co. v. Boswell,16 75 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 124 F. 2d 235. [*27] affirmed 319 U.S. 732, 63 S.Ct. 1430, 87 L.Ed. 1694, indicates that the issue is substantial. We would not have to mark out the full limits of the review. It is sufficient here to permit reappraisal of the construction of a written contract to determine whether, on the contract, there…
• United States ex rel. Foley v. Ragen, 143 F.2d 774 (7th Cir. 1944)
  …e Supreme Court of the United States a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Relator was advised by the clerk of that court, in a letter dated June 7, 1943, of the following order: “In the matter of Ex parte George Foley [319 U.S. 742, 63 S.Ct. 1321, 87 L.Ed. 1694], October term, 1942, the Court today denied the motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus without prejudice to the pending application in the District Court.” That this order furnishes no assistance to the jurisdiction of the Dis…
• Joint Council Dining CAR Emps. Local 370 v. Delaware, 157 F.2d 417 (2d Cir. 1946)
  …128, 88 L.Ed. 96, yet its design and mode of operation, as stated in Elgin, J. & E. R. Co. v. Burley, 325 U.S. 711, 65 S.Ct. 1282, 89 L.Ed. 1886, and Washington Terminal Co. v. Boswell, 75 App.D.C. 1, 124 F. 2d 235, 246, 251, affirmed 319 U.S. 732, 63 S.Ct. 1430, 87 L.Ed. 1694, point that same way. This is a part of the Act setting up a specially constituted board to deal with the so-called minor disputes of the industry — grievances in the interpretation or application of employment agreements. As an integ…