RUMBERGER

v.

WELSH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Thomas, 469 F.2d 145 (8th Cir. 1972)
  …. Their claim that the land was no longer used as part of the reservation does not defeat the fact that the area was still within the boundaries of the Indian Reservation. See Kills Plenty v. United States, 133 F. 2d 292 (8 Cir. 1943), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 759, 63 S.Ct. 1172, 87 L.Ed. 1711. . We have reviewed each of these exhibits. We are satisfied no prejudice resulted in the use of substitutes. Use of this procedure was approved by this court by order issued June 20, 1972. . Evidence of the crime doe…
• Beardslee v. United States, 387 F.2d 280 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …mits of the reservation”. Ellis v. Page, supra, p. 252 of 351 F. 2d.5 5. Although a different and now obsolete statute was involved, this court in effect decided this issue in Kills Plenty v. United States, 133 F. 2d 292 (8 Cir. 1943), cert. denied 319 U.S. 759, 63 S.Ct. 1172, 87 L.Ed. 1711, a case concerning, coincidentally enough, an offense within the original boundaries of the Rosebud Reservation but in the townsite of Mission and “not on Indian lands”. The governing statute was § 329 of the old crimin…

  ← 1 / 2 →