MAINE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Carmack, 329 U.S. 230 (U.S. 1946)
  …403, 406. See also: “The federal statute . . . does not require proof of ‘necessity,’ but makes that question depend solely on the ‘opinion’ of the federal officer. It is controlling here.” United States v. Montana, 134 F. 2d 194, 197, cert. denied, 319 U. S. 772.…
• Karseal Corp. v. Richfield OIL Corp., 221 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. 1955)
  …ic concepts and corollaries. The Clayton Act was part of the overall plan and the “right of the injured party to recover damages was intended to provoke greater respect for the Act * * ”, Maltz v. Sax, 7 Cir., 1943, 134 F. 2d 2, 5, certiorari denied 319 U.S. 772, 63 S.Ct. 1437, 87 L.Ed. 1720. “The treble-damage action was intended not merely to redress injury to an individual through the prohibited practices, but to aid in achieving the broad social object of the statute.” Fanchon & Marco v. Paramount Pictu…
• Consol. Express, Inc. v. NEW York Shipping Ass'n, Inc., 602 F.2d 494 (3d Cir. 1979)
  …ng Act should Twin establish damage to its business or property is an issue not presented on this appeal. . Compare, e.g., The Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 9. . The appellees also’rely on Maltz v. Sax, 134 F. 2d 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 772, 63 S.Ct. 1437, 87 L.Ed. 1720 (1943). We do not believe that holding survives Perma Life.…