ARWOOD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGAHEY, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)
  …dit or discredit, conflicting versions of factual events and the inferences to be drawn from them. N. L. R. B. v. Poultry Enterprise, Inc., 5 Cir., 207 F. 2d 522; N. L. R. B. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 5 Cir., 129 F. 2d 661, certiorari dismissed 319 U.S. 776, 63 S.Ct. 1026, 87 L.Ed. 1723; Jacksonville Paper Co. v. N. L. R. B. 5 Cir., 137 F. 2d 148, certiorari denied 320 U.S. 772, 64 S.Ct. 84, 88 L.Ed. 462; N. L. R. B. v. Coats & Clark (Acworth Plant), 5 Cir., 231 F. 2d 567; N. L. R. B. v. Nabors, 5 Cir.…
• Affronti v. United States, 145 F.2d 3 (8th Cir. 1944)
  …nefit of all the inferences which reasonably may be drawn from the evidence; and must refrain from concerning itself with the credibility of witnesses and the weight of evidence. Holmes v. United States, 8 Cir., 134 F. 2d 125, 130, certiorari denied 319 U.S. 776, 63 S.Ct. 1434, 87 L.Ed. 1722; Egan v. United States, 8 Cir., 137 F. 2d 369, 375, 376; Miller v. United States, 8 Cir., 138 F. 2d 258, 259. The government’s case depended upon the virtually uncorroborated evidence of Narcotic Inspector Morningstar,…
• United States v. Keane, 522 F.2d 534 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …d statute. It is not necessary for all aspects of an alleged scheme to be illegal in their separate parts, but rather only that the scheme viewed as a whole involve fraudulent conduct. Holmes v. United States, 134 F. 2d 125 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 776, 63 S.Ct. 1434, 87 L.Ed. 1722 (1943); United States v. Brandom, 273 F.Supp. 253 (E.D.Wis.1967). The purpose of the mail fraud statute is to prevent the post office from being used to carry schemes to defraud into effect. Parr v. United States, 363…

  ← 1 / 2 →