SYLVANIA INDUSTRIAL CORP.

v.

VISKING CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By

• Brady v. S. Ry. Co., 320 U.S. 476 (U.S. 1943)
  …rt of North Carolina was sought and granted to consider the retroactivity of the last amendment to the Act in conjunction with the contention that there was error in the ruling which held the case improperly submitted to the jury by the trial court. 319 U. S. 777. Our conclusion makes it unnecessary to consider the former problem. The decedent, Earle A. Brady, was a brakeman. At the time of his death he was employed in that capacity in interstate commerce by the respondent, Southern Railway Company. The acc…
• Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 329 U.S. 69 (U.S. 1946)
  …entire record (Clark v. Williard, supra) but, where necessary, by resort to the local law to determine what effect the judgment has under the state rules of practice. Brady v. [*73] Terminal Railroad Assn., 302 U. S. 678; Brady v. Southern Ry. Co., 319 U. S. 777. See Boskey, Finality of State Court Judgments under the Federal Judicial Code, 43 Col. L. Rev. 1002, 1005. This suit is brought under the California Retail Sales Tax Act, § 23 and § 31, which prescribes the sole remedy for challenging the tax. The…
• Preformed Line Prods. Co. v. The Fanner Mfg. Co., 328 F.2d 265 (6th Cir. 1964)
  …34, 75 L.Ed. 819. “Any advantage accruing from this practice is not unlawful, but is attributable to the monopoly conferred by the patent statute.” Sylvania Industrial Corp. v. Visking Corp., 132 F. 2d 947, 958, C.A. 4, petition for cert. dismissed, 319 U.S. 777, 63 S.Ct. 1033, 87 L.Ed. 1723. The plaintiff has attempted to fix its own date as to the time the purge was effected. It arrives at this date as the time that it discontinued its illegal practices. That is only a part of the requirement for a purge…