GRAF ET AL.

v.

NEWARK

Citator

Cited By

• High OL' Times, Inc. v. Busbee, 621 F.2d 135 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …ned that the district court’s subject matter jurisdiction was properly invoked under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343(3) and (4), without regard to any amount in controversy, see Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157, 63 S.Ct. 877, 87 L.Ed. 1324, reh. denied, 319 U.S. 782, 63 S.Ct. 1170, 87 L.Ed. 1726 (1943), our remaining task is to review the propriety of the district court’s abstention. Fundamental abstention analysis in the context of a federal constitutional claim against state officials begins with Railroad Co…
• Morris v. Watt, 640 F.2d 404 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …section 28 had the effect of continuing indefinitely the existence of the tribe has been confirmed by each court that has examined the question. ... Board of County Commissions v. Seber, 318 U.S. 705 [63 S.Ct. 920, 87 L.Ed. 1094] (1943), reh. den., 319 U.S. 782 [63 S.Ct. 1162, 87 L.Ed. 1726] (1943), ... Creek Nation v. United States, 318 U.S. 629 [63 S.Ct. 784, 87 L.Ed. 780] (1943), .. . Groundhog v. Keeler, 442 F. 2d 674 (10th Cir. 1971). 420 F.Supp. at 1129. . The Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act of 1936, 4…