THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, COMPLAINANT
v.
THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS

U.S. | 1833-01-01
7 Pet. 651 Supreme Court of the United States (1833) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 8 L. Ed. 816 · 1833 U.S. LEXIS 369 · SCDB 1833-026
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co., 304 U.S. 92 (U.S. 1938)
    …v. Kansas, Original No. 6 (Arkansas River); Nebraska v. Wyoming, 295 U. S. 40, Original No. 9 (North Platte River); Texas v. New Mexico, Original No. 11 (Rio Grande). The long drawn out irritating boundary litigation, Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 7 Pet. 651; 11 Pet. 226; 12 Pet. 657, 755; 13 Pet 23; 14 Pet. 210; 15 Pet. 233; 4 How. 591; was finally settled by a Compact. See Frankfurter and Landis, supra note 5, at 696, 737-38 “We cannot withhold the suggestion, inspired by the consideration of this ca…
  • Commonwealth of Va. v. State of W. Va., 246 U.S. 565 (U.S. 1918)
    …; 231 U. S. 89; 234 U. S. 117; 238 U. S. 202; 241 U. S. 531. Gannett, Boundaries of the United States, pp. 24r-29. New York v. Connecticut, 4 Dall. 1, 3, 6; New Jersey v. New York, 3 Pet. 461; 5 Pet. 284; 6 Pet. 323; Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 7 Pet. 651; 11 Pet. 226; 12 Pet. 657; 13 Pet. 23; 14 Pet. 210; 15 Pet. 233 ; 4 How. 591; Massachusetts v. Rhode Island, 12 Pet. 755; Missouri v. Iowa, 7 How. 660; 10 How. 1; Florida v. Georgia, 11 How. 293; 17 How. 478; Alabama v. Georgia, 23 How. 505; Virgini…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw