CHACE

v.

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE BAR OF ALABAMA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 366 U.S. 316 (U.S. 1961)
  …also H. R. Rep. No. 3020, 57th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 (1903). In one case this elimination of the normal review by the Court of Appeals almost prevented there being any review of the District Court at all. See United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 320 U. S. 708 (1943) (noting the absence of a quorum in this Court to hear an Expediting Act appeal from a District Court). But Congress acted to keep such an important matter from going unreviewed, see H. R. Rep. No. 1317, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. (1944), and enacte…
• United States v. United States Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of N.Y., 334 U.S. 258 (U.S. 1948)
  …isqualification of four Justices to sit in the case, we were without a quorum. Accordingly, we transferred the case to a special docket and postponed further proceedings in it until such time as there was a quorum of Justices qualified to sit in it. 320 U. S. 708. Thereafter Congress amended the statute which provides for a direct appeal to this Court from the District Court in antitrust cases. The Act of June 9, 1944, c. 239, 58 Stat. 272,15 U. S. C. (Supp. V, 1946) § 29, passed to meet the contingency of t…
• Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, 519 F.2d 974 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …n lieu of the Supreme Court by virtue of a 1944 amendment to 15 U.S.C. § 29 (certification of appeal of Government civil antitrust action to court of appeals when no quorum of Justices in Supreme Court). See United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 320 U.S. 708, 64 S.Ct. 73, 88 L.Ed.2d 415 (1943). . There may be agreements made beyond our borders not intended to affect imports, which do affect them, or which affect exports. Almost any limitation of the supply of goods in Europe, for example, or in South A…

Authorities Cited

• Ex parte Robinson, 19 Wall. 505 (U.S. 1873)
• In re the Petition of Selling v. Radford, 243 U.S. 46 (U.S. 1917)
• Ex Parte, 19 How. 9 (U.S. 1856)