EX PARTE KENNETH M. RING; EX PARTE PAUL S. CAMPBELL; EX PARTE GEORGE DIEHL; EX PARTE JAKE HINLEY; AND EX PARTE KENNETH L. HENDRIX
EX PARTE KENNETH M. RING; EX PARTE PAUL S. CAMPBELL; EX PARTE GEORGE DIEHL; EX PARTE JAKE HINLEY; AND EX PARTE KENNETH L. HENDRIX
320 U.S. 713
Supreme Court of the United States (1943)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hinley v. Burford, 183 F.2d 581 (10th Cir. 1950)…dgment and sentence by numerous petitions for a writ in both state and federal courts. In 1943 a petition was denied by the Oklahoma Criminal Court of Appeals (not officially reported), and by the Supreme Court of the United States, Ex parte Hinley, 320 U.S. 713, 64 S.Ct. 198, 88 L.Ed. 418. In 1945 a petition was denied by the Oklahoma Criminal Court of Appeals, Ex parte Hinley, 155 P. 2d 265; in 1947 a petition was heard and denied in the District Court of Pittsburg County, Oklahoma; another petition was d…