FORD MOTOR CO.

v.

GORDON FORM LATHE CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Ervin v. Richardson, 70 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1954)
  …n machinery, the [*588] right to yote is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. Other Federal decisions and decisions of this Court support that premise. U. S. v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299, 61 S.Ct. 1031, 85 L.Ed. 1368; Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649, 64 S.Ct. 257, 88 L.Ed. 987, 151 A.L.R. 1110.;, Grovey. v. Townsend, 295 U.S. 45, 55 S.Ct. 622, 79 L. Ed. 1292, 97 A.L.R, 680; Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461, 73 S.Ct. 809, 97 L.Ed. 1152; Thomas v. State ex rel. Cobb, Fla., 58 So. 2d 173; Bowden v. Carter, Fla., 65…
• Int'l Indus., Inc. v. Warren Petroleum Corp., 248 F.2d 696 (3d Cir. 1957)
  …the use of the trade secret with a method of accomplishing the same result which would have been open to defendant had he not appropriated the trade secret. Gordon Form Lathe Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 6 Cir., 133 F. 2d 487, affirmed 1943, 320 U.S. 714, 64 S.Ct. 257, 88 L.Ed. 419. The master found that the proper standard with which to compare the marine transportation of LPG was that of railroad transportation. Although Warren attacks this choice as improper, we are satisfied that it was appropriate as a sta…
• Sperry Rand Corp. v. A-T-O, 447 F.2d 1387 (4th Cir. 1971)
  …he court remarked at one point that “the profits are simply measured by the savings.” (emphasis supplied.) 248 F. 2d at 702. Gordon Form Lathe Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 133 F. 2d 487 (6 Cir. 1943), aff’d. memo by an equally divided court, 320 U.S. 714, 64 S.Ct. 257, 88 L.Ed. 419 (1943), not cited by the parties but relied on in International Industries was a patent infringement case where the “comparison of cost method” of assessing damages was also employed but the opinion makes even clearer than Internationa…