EX PARTE WADE H. COOPER

Citator

Cited By

• New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (U.S. 1970)
  …lies only to a district court (of one judge) sitting in bankruptcy, not to a district court (of three judges) assembled under the Urgent Deficiencies Act,” Id., at 67.58 On direct appeal, this Court summarily affirmed the District Court's judgment. 320 U. S. 718. Even closer in point is a case that arose during the first reorganization of the New Haven Railroad—Group of Boston & Providence R. Corp. Stockholders v. ICC, 133 F. Supp. 488. Shareholders of the Boston & Providence, also undergoing reorganizati…
• The B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Nw. Indus., Inc., 424 F.2d 1349 (3d Cir. 1970)
  …me limited exceptions to this procedure. See e. g. United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 337 U.S. 426, 69 S.Ct. 1410, 93 L.Ed. 1451 (1949); Chicago & North Western Ry. v. United States, 52 F.Supp. 65, 67 (N.D. Ill.1943), aff’d per curiam, 320 U.S. 718, 64 S.Ct. 369, 88 L.Ed. 422 (1943). . § 2321. The procedure in the district courts in actions to enforce, suspend, enjoin, annul or set aside in whole or in part any order of the Interstate Commerce Commission * * * shall be as provided in this cha…
• Okin v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 145 F.2d 206 (2d Cir. 1944)
  …. § 47, has been held inapplicable to 'a Commission order approving a plan of reorganization, which was, of course, subject to further approval by the district court. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. United States, D. C. N. D. Ill., 52 F.Supp. 65, affirmed 320 U.S. 718, 64 S.Ct. 369. Even Without the statement in the legislative debates, the two situations would have appeared so closely comparable as to make this precedent persuasive. . Finally, the practicalities of the situation press heavily for this result. I…