BILLINGS
v.
TRUESDELL, MAJOR GENERAL, U. S. A.
BILLINGS
TRUESDELL, MAJOR GENERAL, U. S. A.
320 U.S. 725
Supreme Court of the United States (1943)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mahnich v. S. S.S. Co., 321 U.S. 96 (U.S. 1944)…on the statement quoted from the opinion in The Pinar Del Rio, supra, 155, that “The record does not support the suggestion that the ‘Pinar Del Rio’ was unseaworthy. The mate selected a bad rope when good ones were available.” We granted certiorari, 320 U. S. 725, upon a petition which urged that the statement quoted from The Pinar Del Rio, supra, does not rule this case, and that the decision below is inconsistent with the decisions in The Osceola, 189 U. S. 158, and in Socony-Vacuum Co. v. Smith, 305 U. S.…
-
Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Prods., Inc., 322 U.S. 607 (U.S. 1944)…his conelusion [*609] by holding that a portion of the definition of “area of production” made by the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division was invalid and that the remaining portion afforded exemption. 136 F. 2d 323. We brought the case here, 320 U. S. 725, to settle a much litigated question of importance in the administration of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Holly Hill, a citrus fruit cannery employing some two hundred workers, is located in Davenport, Florida, a town with a population of about 650…
-
Polish Nat'l Alliance of the United States of N. Am. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 322 U.S. 643 (U.S. 1944)…ross-petition of the Board for enforcement, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit sustained the order. 136 F. 2d 175. Of the numerous issues before that court only two are open here, the importance of which led us to grant certiorari. 320 U. S. 725. The questions are these: (1) In view of the petitioner’s activities, is the conduct found by the Board to constitute unfair labor practices within the scope of the National Labor Relations Act; (2) if Congress has proscribed such conduct, has it ex…