NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

v.

HEARST PUBLICATIONS, INC.; NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. STOCKHOLDERS PUBLISHING CO., INC.; AND NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. TIMES-MIRROR COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hearst Publ'ns, Inc., 322 U.S. 111 (U.S. 1944)
  …r regular and substantially equivalent employment, but shall not include any individual [*114] employed as an agricultural laborer, or in the domestic service of any family or person at his home, or any individual employed by his parent or spouse.” 320 U. S. 728. Pursuant to § 9 (b) and (c) of the Act; 49 Stat. 453, 29 U. S. C. § 159 (b) and (c).. Although it treated the four representation petitions in one consolidated proceeding and disposed of them in one opinion, the Board did not consider evidence wi…
• McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co., 322 U.S. 327 (U.S. 1944)
  …. Berwind-White Co., 309 U. S. 33, requiring a change in its constitutional views. 205 Ark. 780, 171 S. W. 2d 62. To permit further examination of the complicated problems raised by the interplay of federal and state powers we brought the case here. 320 U. S. 728. [*329] We agree with the Arkansas Supreme Court that the Berwind-White case presented a situation different from this case and that this case is on the other side of the line which marks off the limits of state power. A boundary line is none the wo…