UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS CO.
v.
GLOBE OIL & REFINING CO.
UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS CO.
GLOBE OIL & REFINING CO.
320 U.S. 730
Supreme Court of the United States (1943)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cramer v. United States, 325 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1945)…. Ill. 1942), reversed on other grounds, 136 F. 2d 661 (C. C. A. 7th, 1943). “The overt act is the doing of some actual act, looking towards the accomplishment of the crime.” United States v. Stephan, 50 F. Supp. 738, 742-43 n. (E. D. Mich. 1943). 320 U. S. 730. May 22, 1944. Counsel for petitioner, although assigned by the trial court, has responded with extended researches. The Solicitor General engaged scholars not otherwise involved in conduct of the case to collect and impartially to summarize statut…
-
Universal Oil Prods. Co. v. Globe OIL & Ref. Co., 322 U.S. 471 (U.S. 1944)…uit [*473] found the same patents to be valid and infringed by the use of a process substantially similar to respondent’s in Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co., 78 F. 2d 991. To resolve the conflict thus presented we granted certiorari, 320 U. S. 730. Where the questions presented by the contested claims of infringement and validity are purely factual, this Court ordinarily accepts the concurrent conclusions of the district court and Circuit Court of Appeals in these cases. Goodyear Co. v. Ray-…