BUCKEYE UNION CASUALTY CO.

v.

RANALLO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Royal Indem. Co. v. Eagle Star Ins. Co., Ltd., 21 Fla. Supp. 195 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1963)
  …the loss. Globe National Fire Ins. Co. v. American Bonding and Casualty Co., Iowa, 217 N.W. 268; Fireman’s Fund Ind. Co. v. Shelby Mutual Cas. Co., Ohio, 117 N.E. 2d 477; Buckeye Union Cas. Co. v. Ransilo, 135 Fed. 2d 921 (C.C.A. 6th), cert, denied 320 U.S. 745; Farm Bureau Mutual Auto Ins. Co. v. Buckeye Union Cas. Co., Ohio, 67 N.E. 2d 906. [*199] It is apparent that under pro rata clauses, each insurer is liable for its proportionate share and is never liable for the entire loss. The defendants, Moskov…
• United Servs. Auto. Ass'n v. Russom, 241 F.2d 296 (5th Cir. 1957)
  …settlement and not an actual! trial required by the No-action Clause of the policy. Fearing that Ranallo v. Hinman Bros. Const. Co., D.C.Ohio, 49 F.Supp. 920, affirmed Buckeye Union Casualty Co. v. Ranallo, 6 Cir., 135 F. 2d 921, certiorari denied 320 U.S. 745, 64 S.Ct. 47, 88 L.Ed. 442, establishes for Ohio too loose a practice or that Section 9510-4 of the Ohio Code of 1948 may give an absolute statutory right to a jjudgment creditor to proceed directly against the underwriter, it speeds swiftly to Dall…
• United States v. Celedonia Morales, 577 F.2d 769 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …that she believed that the case contained something other than narcotics. See, e. g., United States v. Lozaw, 427 F. 2d 911, 916 (2d Cir. 1970); United States v. Turley, 135 F. 2d 867, 869-70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Burns v. United States, 320 U.S. 745, 64 S.Ct. 47, 88 L.Ed. 442 (1943); United States v. Waskow, 519 F. 2d 1345, 1347 (8th Cir. 1975). However, the jury did have before it evidence that appellant spoke little or no English and that, upon being arrested, she advised the agents that she…