REDUS

v.

WILLIAMS, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hoffman, 806 F.2d 703 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …hat Hoffman might very well have had a motive in threatening the President. The law is eminently clear that the court may receive evidence as to the defendant’s motive. As the Fifth Circuit held in Reid v. United States, 136 F. 2d 476, cert. denied, 320 U.S. 775, 64 S.Ct. 87, 88 L.Ed. 465 (1943), where the government introduced evidence as to previous pro-German statements of the defendant: “[ejvidence as to appellant’s pro-German attitude was relevant to the issue as to whether the statements against the P…
• Gillespie-Rogers-Pyatt Co., Inc. v. Bowles, 144 F.2d 361 (Emer. Ct. App. 1944)
  …industry derived from the sale of the commodity has actually resulted. Chatlos v. Brown, Em.App.1943, 136 F. 2d 490; Lakemore Co. v. Brown, Em.App.1943, 137 F. 2d 355; United States Gypsum Co. v. Brown, Em.App.1943, 137 F. 2d 360, certiorari denied 320 U.S. 775, 64 S.Ct. 88; Spaeth v. Brown, Em.App. 1943, 137 F. 2d 669; Philadelphia Coke Co. v. Bowles, Em.App.1943, 139 F. 2d 349; Madison Park Corp. v. Bowles, Em.App. 1943, 140 F. 2d 316; Interwoven Stocking Co. v. Bowles, Em.App. 1944, 141 F. 2d 696. It f…
• Normand P. Michaud v. United States, 350 F.2d 131 (10th Cir. 1965)
  …the Metzdorf case represents the extreme minority view and has not been followed by other courts, see, e. g., Ragansky v. United States, 7 Cir., 253 F. 643; United States v. Reid, W.D.La., 49 F.Supp. 313, aff’d, 5 Cir., 136 F. 2d 476, cert. denied, 320 U.S. 775, 64 S.Ct. 87, 88 L.Ed. 465; United States v. Stickrath, S.D.Ohio, 242 F. 151. By inserting the words “knowingly and willfully” in the statute, Congress was referring to the intentional nature of the threat. As the Seventh Circuit stated in Ragansky…