MURRAY

v.

NED ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Major Appliances, Inc. v. Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co., 462 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …ct court on March 10, 1976, does not support the defendant's position, as the federal court stay tolled the time period for bringing an action in the state court. See Lincoln Joint Stock Land Bank v. Barnes, 143 Neb. 58, 8 N.W. 2d 545, cert. denied, 320 U.S. 781, 64 S.Ct. 191, 88 L.Ed. 469 (1943) (where mortgagee was enjoined by a federal court from proceeding with state foreclosure action, statute of limitations did not run during the period that mortgagee was prevented from exercising his legal remedy).…
• United States v. Barra, 149 F.2d 489 (2d Cir. 1945)
  …ion to offer sufficient to make it a substantial issue. Cf. United States v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 303 U.S. 239, 242, 243, 58 S.Ct. 533, 82 L.Ed. 773; United States v. Goldsmith, 2 Cir., 137 F. 2d 393, certiorari denied Goldsmith v. United States, 320 U.S. 781, 64 S. Ct. 190, 88 L.Ed. 469. To expect jurors to deny that they will be influenced by facts which, if unexplained, should certainly influence them is to look for jurors either dishonest or hopelessly confused, so much [*491] so as conceivably to d…
• Midwestern Transp., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 635 F.2d 771 (10th Cir. 1980)
  …eas between the terminal points, and the regulation of carriers entrusted to the ICC permits the Commission’s designation of routes in the public interest. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. United States, 136 F. 2d 921 (8th Cir. 1943), cert. denied, 320 U.S. 781, 64 S.Ct. 188, 88 L.Ed. 469 (1943). While a reviewing court cannot interfere with discretionary functions vested in a governmental agency, the court must require the agency to adhere to its own pronouncements or explain its departure from them; an…