TRIANGLE CONDUIT & CABLE CO., INC.

v.

NATIONAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTS CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Cresta Blanca Wine Co., Inc. v. E. Wine Corp., 143 F.2d 1012 (2d Cir. 1944)
  …oceeding later instituted in another federal district arises “only if the controversy in each court involves the same issues and the same parties.” Triangle C. & C. Co. v. National Electric Products Corp., 3 Cir., 138 F. 2d 46, 47, certiorari denied 320 U.S. 784, 64 S.Ct. 191. Schenley was not a party to the New York suit. Only if Cresta should obtain a favorable judgment in that suit would it be entitled to restrain the prosecution by Eastern of an infringement action against a distributor of Cresta’s wine…
• Mallinckrodt v. Nunan, 146 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1945)
  …berts in the dissenting opinion in Helvering v. Clifford, 309 U.S. 331, 338, 60 S.Ct. 554, 84 L.Ed. 788, in which case this Court was reversed. See also the dissenting opinion in Jergens v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 136 F. 2d 497, 498, certiorari denied 320 U.S. 784, 64 S.Ct 192. In the absence of the construction and effect which has been accorded to section 22(a) by the Supreme Court in Helvering v. Clifford, supra, and other similar cases, one could well believe that it was the intent of Congress that a bona…
• Thompson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 476 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …nce with another’s business. See Sparks v. McCrary, 1908, 156 Ala. 382, 47 So. 332; Carter v. Knapp Motor Co., 1943, 243 Ala. 600, 11 So. 2d 383; Lash v. State, 1943, 31 Ala.App. 121, 14 So. 2d 235, cert. den. 244 Ala. 568, 14 So. 2d 242, cert. den. 320 U.S. 784, 64 S.Ct. 192, 88 L.Ed. 471. Allstate contends, however, that the plaintiff’s complaint is deficient because it states only that Allstate did not act for “any legitimate economic reason or purpose” and thus fails to negative the possibility of a non…