MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
v.
THOMPSON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.; PROTECTIVE COMMITTEE FOR HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK OF MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. V. THOMPSON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.; AND ALLEGHANY CORPORATION V. THOMPSON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
THOMPSON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.; PROTECTIVE COMMITTEE FOR HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK OF MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. V. THOMPSON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.; AND ALLEGHANY CORPORATION V. THOMPSON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.
320 U.S. 806
Supreme Court of the United States (1943)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re New York, 147 F.2d 40 (2d Cir. 1945)…f reorganization. See State of Texas v. United States, 292 U.S. 522, 531, 54 S.Ct. 819, 78 L.Ed. 1402; In re Missouri Pac. R. Co., D.C.E.D.Mo., 39 F.Supp. 436, 448, affirmed, Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Thompson, 8 Cir., 134 F. 2d 139, certiorari denied 320 U.S. 806, 64 S.Ct. 187. The appellants argue that the plan is subject to the objection discussed in the Old Colony appeal, namely, that the Commission merely adopted the suggestions of the Joint Report. There is nothing wrong with such an adoption, if the C…