EX PARTE FRANK HARRIS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. 100 Acres OF Land, 468 F.2d 1261 (9th Cir. 1972)
  …in determining market value of condemned property, evidence as to the reasonable probabilities of its use is admissible and may be considered. See McCandless v. United States, supra; United States v. Waterhouse, 132 F. 2d 699 (9th Cir. 1943), aff’d. 321 U.S. 743, 64 S.Ct. 484, 88 L.Ed. 1047 (1944). The weight to be given evidence of reasonable probability is a question for the trier of fact. Cf. Olson v. United States, supra. Evidence in regard to prospective uses is admissible and whether adaptability and…
• United States v. 1, 411 F.2d 1081 (6th Cir. 1969)
  …ings if evidence shows a reasonable probability of adaptability of lands for specific uses evidence regarding the value of the property for such prospective uses should be received. United States v. Waterhouse, 132 F. 2d 699 (9th Cir., 1943), aff’d. 321 U.S. 743, 64 S.Ct. 484, 88 L.Ed. 1047 (1944); Olson v. United States, 292 U.S. 246, 54 S.Ct. 704, 78 L.Ed. 1236 (1934). We conclude, based upon the facts as they appear on the record on appeal, that the trial court should have received and considered testim…
• United States v. 3.544 Acres OF Land, 147 F.2d 596 (3d Cir. 1945)
  …course future and speculative value as a lot proposition could not be considered, and, as we read the testimony, this rule was not violated.” See also United States v. Waterhouse, 9 Cir., 132 P. 2d 699, affirmed by an equally divided Supreme Court, 321 U.S. 743, 64 S.Ct. 484. The appellant further contends that the entire testimony of Phillips, the other real estate expert on behalf of the landowner, should have been stricken out for the same reason as that of Tomlinson. Philips stated that his opinion of…