JOHN J. CASALE, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
JOHN J. CASALE, INC.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
321 U.S. 752
Supreme Court of the United States (1944)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware.
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Illinois Central R. Co., 244 U. S. 82, 89; Federal Power Commission v. Edison Co., 304 U. S. 375, 384—5; Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United States, 307 U. S. 125, 130.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Miller v. Sanford, 161 F.2d 291 (5th Cir. 1947)…of petitioner, to be rectified. Miller v. United States, 5 Cir., 128 F. 2d 519. We thought this had been sufficiently done in Miller v. United States, 5 Cir., 136 F. 2d 287, but the Supreme Court directed a further hearing, Miller v. United States, 321 U.S. 752, 64 S.Ct. 634, 88 L.Ed. 1052, and the judgment of May 16, 1944, was the result. As appears on its face it is not a new sentence, but the settling of the legal effect of the various sentences imposed during January, 1939, adjudged to be an imprisonme…
Authorities Cited
- Rochester Tel. Corp. v. United States, 307 U.S. 125 (U.S. 1939)
- Fed. Power Comm'n v. Metro. Edison Co., 304 U.S. 375 (U.S. 1938)
- United States v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co., 244 U.S. 82 (U.S. 1917)