CAROLENE PRODUCTS CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Muschany v. United States, 324 U.S. 49 (U.S. 1945)
  …tates for the purchase of land for the Weldon Springs, Missouri, ordnance plant.2 The contracts were pleaded by petitioners as defendants in eminent domain suits to establish the proper condemnation award. The petitions for certiorari were granted, 321 U. S. 760, because of asserted conflict with United States v. Grace Evangelical Church, 132 F. 2d 460. Jurisdiction of this Court rests on § 240 of the Judicial Code. Under the authority of the Second Supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act of 1941,…
• Carolene Prods. Co. v. United States, 323 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1944)
  …which upheld the act’s validity upon demurrer to an earlier indictment which charged its violation. United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U. S. 144.2 Since these is [*20] sues are important to those affected by the act, certiorari was granted. 321 U. S. 760. Questions of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment, similar to those presented here, had arisen from state filled-milk legislation with varying results.3 Consideration by this Court of the filled-milk legislation of Kansas appears in Sage Stor…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Muschany, 156 F.2d 196 (8th Cir. 1946)
  …annum upon the amount of the award. In December, 1942, the government appealed from these judgments. This Court reversed the District Court on the ground that the purchase contracts were invalid. 139 F. 2d 661. The Supreme Court granted certiorari, 321 U.S. 760, 64 S.Ct. 846, 88 L.Ed. 1058, and reversed this Court, 324 U.S. [*197] 49, 65 S.Ct. 442, 89 L.Ed. 744, holding that the compensation recoverable by the appellees was to be determined from the contracts. Each of the cases was remanded by the Supreme…