PATRICK CUDAHY FAMILY COMPANY

v.

BOWLES, PRICE ADMINISTRATOR

Citator

Cited By

• Wilkerson v. McCARTHY, 336 U.S. 53 (U.S. 1949)
  …s of negligence and contributory negligence was sustained: McCarthy v. Bruner, 323 U. S. 673. II. Cases in which certiorari was denied: A. Where lower court withheld case from jury and rendered judgment for the employer: Beamer v. Virginian R. Co., 321 U. S. 763. Cowdrick v. Penn. R. Co, 323 U. S. 799. Negro v. Boston & Maine R., 324 U. S. 862. Fantini v. Reading Co., 325 U. S. 856. Scarborough v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 326 U. S. 755. Chisholm v. Reading Co., 329 U. S. 807. Waller v. Northern P. T. Co.…
• Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King NUT Co., 477 F.2d 326 (6th Cir. 1973)
  …t it should take precedence over the rule of the law of contracts that a person should be held to his undertakings. Such a decision is far from unique. In E. F. Prichard Co. v. Consumers Brewing Co., 136 F. 2d 512, 522 (6th Cir. 1943), cert. denied, 321 U.S. 763, 64 S.Ct. 486, 88 L.Ed. 1060 (1944), this court held that a contract declaring one party to be the owner of a trademark would estop the other party from later contesting the mark’s title. In Peyrat v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc., 247 F.Supp. 1009 (S.…
• Pac. Supply Coop. v. Farmers Union Cent. Exch., 318 F.2d 894 (9th Cir. 1963)
  …al [*909] circumstances of the use. Hicks v. Anchor Packing Co., 3 Cir. 1926, 16 F. 2d 723, 726; Medd v. Boyd Wagner, Inc., D.C., 1955, 132 F.Supp. 399; E. F. Prichard Co. v. Consumers Brewing Co., 6 Cir. 1943, 136 F. 2d 512, 522, certiorari denied, 321 U.S. 763, 64 S.Ct. 486, 88 L. Ed. 1060. (4) Appellant relies upon an alleged contract for exclusive use of trademarks allegedly existing over a period of years, and then a “revocation action” or “policy change” that denied the right to exclusive use, with a…