WERNECKE
v.
UNITED STATES
WERNECKE
UNITED STATES
321 U.S. 771
Supreme Court of the United States (1944)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
California Apparel Creators v. Wieder OF Cal., Inc., 162 F.2d 893 (2d Cir. 1947)…sbury-Washburn Flour-Mills Co. v. Eagle, 7 Cir., 86 F. 608, 41 L.R.A. 162, certiorari denied 173 U.S. 703, 19 S.Ct. 884, 43 L.Ed. 1184; Grand Rapids Furniture Co. v. Grand Rapids Furniture Co., 7 Cir., 127 F. 2d 245, 138 F. 2d 212, certiorari denied 321 U.S. 771, 64 S.Ct. 529, 88 L.Ed. 1066; Douglas v. Newark Cheese Co., 153 Misc. 85, 274 N.Y.S. 406; Schweizerishe Kaeseunion Bern v. Saul Starck, Inc., 162 Misc. 485, 293 N.Y.S. 816; Douglas v. Mod-Urn Cheese Packing Co., 161 Misc. 21, 290 N.Y.S. 368. It is…
-
United States v. Smith, 474 F.2d 844 (3d Cir. 1973)…tly state that a local board order was made. United States v. Johnston, 227 F. 2d 745, 747 (3d Cir. 1955), aff’d, 351 U.S. 215, 76 S.Ct. 739, 100 L.Ed. 1097 (1956); cf. United States v. Wernecke, 138 F. 2d 561, 563-564 (7th Cir. 1943), cert. denied, 321 U.S. 771, 64 S.Ct. 529, 88 L.Ed. 1066 (1944). Smith did violate a duty under the Act. Under 50 App.U.S.C. § 462, registrants are given “the duty of carrying out any of the provisions of this title.” One of the provisions of the title, 50 App.U.S.C. § 454, p…