DAVIS

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Nelson v. United States (two cases), 208 F.2d 505 (D.C. Cir. 1953)
  …uller v. United States, 2 Cir., 1929, 31 F. 2d 747, certiorari denied, 1929, 280 U.S. 556, 50 S.Ct. 17, 74 L.Ed. 612, or as a result of its being filed as a public record, Davis v. United States, 5 Cir., 1943, 138 F. 2d 406, certiorari denied, 1944, 321 U.S. 775, 64 S.Ct. 616, 88 L.Ed. 1069; and (4) a federal prison official who obtained it pursuant to “established practice, reasonably designed to promote the discipline of the institution,” and not as a result of “threat or coercion,” Stroud v. United State…
• Linens v. Bowles, 144 F.2d 874 (Emer. Ct. App. 1944)
  …of the term. Fox v. Standard Oil Co., 1935, 294 U.S. 87, 55 S.Ct. 333, 79 L.Ed. 780. The same rule has been applied to an administrative regulation issued under statutory authority. Pearson v. Walling, 8 Cir., 1943, 138 F. 2d 655, certiorari denied 321 U.S. 775, 64 S.Ct. 616. The Administrator dismissed the protest because not timely filed and urges that the complaint should be dismissed for the same reason. In view of the lack of any real ambiguity in the Regulation it may well be questioned whether the…
• Libby v. Mitchell, 256 F.2d 832 (5th Cir. 1958)
  …the Administrator. Opp Cotton Mills v. Administrator, 312 U.S. 126, 149-150, 657, 61 S.Ct. 524, 85 L.Ed. 624, 638; Columbus & G. Ry. Co. v. Administrator, 5 Cir., 126 F. 2d 136, 139; Pearson v. Walling, 8 Cir., 138 F. 2d 655, 657, certiorari denied 321 U.S. 775, 64 S.Ct. 616, 88 L.Ed. 1069. We disagree, however, that the effective date was 1952 so that, as asserted in the Administrator’s complaint for injunction, this Employer was in violation “during the period since February 27, 1953” with respect to it…