BIRMINGHAM CORPORATION

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• Myres v. United States, 174 F.2d 329 (8th Cir. 1949)
  …r v. Hall, 16 Wall. 584, 599, 83 U.S. 584, 599, 21 L.Ed. 504; General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. United States, 6 Cir., 40 F. 2d 599, 600; Cleo Syrup Corporation v. Coca-Cola Co., 8 Cir., 139 F. 2d 416, 419, 150 A.L.R. 1056, certiorari denied. 321 U.S. 781, 64 S.Ct. 638, 88 L.Ed. 1074. The District Court committed no error in refusing to direct a verdict of acquittal. • [8,9] At the close of the first day of the trial, counsel for the defendant, after the count had announced a recess until the follo…
• Harold F. Ritchie, Inc. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc., 281 F.2d 755 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …lists some 32 cleansing “creams” and becomes quite indefinite as to the number of shaving and dental creams. . Not all circuits agree. See, e.g., Cleo Syrup Corp. v. Coca-Cola Co., 8 Cir., 139 F. 2d 416, 417, 418, 150 A.L.R. 1056, certiorari denied 321 U.S. 781, 64 S.Ct. 638, 88 L.Ed. 1074. . See the words of Chief Judge McAllis-ter in S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Johnson, 6 Cir., 266 F. 2d 129, 141: “The owner of a trademark is not entitled to a guarantee against confusion in the minds of careless and in…
• Snodgrass v. Nelson, 503 F.2d 94 (8th Cir. 1974)
  …issioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278, 289-291, 80 S.Ct. 1190, 1198-1199, 4 L.Ed.2d 1218 (1960). Id. at 123, 89 S.Ct. at 1576. See also Cleo Syrup Co. v. Coca-Cola Co., 139 F. 2d 416, 417-418 (8th Cir. 1943), cert. de [*96] nied, 321 U.S. 781, 64 S.Ct. 638, 88 L.Ed. 1074 (1944). It is also settled that the complaining party has the burden to clearly demonstrate error in the court’s findings. This is a strong burden where, as here, the findings are primarily based upon oral testimony and…