FENTON

v.

WALLING, ADMINISTRATOR; AND SMITH V. WALLING, ADMINISTRATOR

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• David v. The Hooker, Ltd, 560 F.2d 412 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …Moore’s Federal Practice 1110.13[4] at 167 (“Moore’s”), 8 Wright and Miller § 2006 at 30; Premium Service Corp. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 511 F. 2d 225, 227-29 (9th Cir. 1975); Fenton v. Walling, 139 F. 2d 608, 610 (9th Cir. 1943), cert. denied,- 321 U.S. 798, 64 S.Ct. 938, 88 L.Ed. 1086 (1944). It has long been held that a non-party in a pending suit may appeal a sentence for civil contempt. Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U.S. 324, 338, 24 S.Ct. 665, 48 L.Ed. 997 (1904); Fenton, supra, 139 F. 2d at…
• In re Subpoena addressed to Samuel W. Murphy, Jr. v. Pfizer Inc., 560 F.2d 326 (8th Cir. 1977)
  …F. 2d 112, 115 n. 1 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, [*333] 416 U.S. 995, 94 S.Ct. 2409, 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974); In re Manufacturers Trading Corp., 194 F. 2d 948, 955 (6th Cir. 1952); Fenton v. Walling, 139 F. 2d 608, 610 (9th Cir. 1943), cert. denied, 321 U.S. 798, 64 S.Ct. 938, 88 L.Ed. 1086 (1944); 9 Moore’s Federal Practice fl 110.-13[4] at 167 (2d ed. 1975). See United States v. Ryan, 402 U.S. 530, 532, 91 S.Ct. 1580, 29 L.Ed.2d 85 (1971). Here, the contemnors are not parties in the underlying action…
• Halderman v. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp., 673 F.2d 628 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …nterpretation of § 1291. See Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S.Ct. 356, 50 L.Ed. 686 (1906); Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U.S. 324, 24 S.Ct. 665, 48 L.Ed. 997 (1904); Fenton v. Walling, 139 F. 2d 608 (9th Cir. 1943), cert. denied, 321 U.S. 798, 64 S.Ct. 938, 88 L.Ed. 1086 (1944). . In Rennie v. Klein, 653 F. 2d 836, 849 (3d Cir. 1981) (en banc), this Court held that when state procedures facially complied with constitutional requirements and state officials were in good faith implementin…