CLARKE, ADMINISTRATRIX,
v.
STORCHAK
CLARKE, ADMINISTRATRIX,
STORCHAK
322 U.S. 713
Supreme Court of the United States (1944)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Silver v. Silver, 280 U. S. 117.
Messrs. John E. Owens and Thomas L. Owens for appellant.
Mr. Edward R. Adams for appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carr v. United States, 422 F.2d 1007 (4th Cir. 1970)…on does not forbid the creation of new rights, or the abolition of old ones recognized by the common law * * *.” Id., at 122, 50 S.Ct., at 58. There has been no indication that this is not the settled law on the question. E. g., Clarke v. Storchak, 322 U.S. 713, 64 S.Ct. 1270, 88 L.Ed. 1555 (1944), dismissing appeal for want of a substantial federal question from 384 Ill. 564, 52 N.E. 2d 229 (1943). Nothing in Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United States, 275 U.S. 331, 48 S.Ct. 194, 72 L.Ed. 303 (1928), con…
Authorities Cited
- Silver v. Silver, 280 U.S. 117 (U.S. 1929)